Skip to main content
#Title
6426Environmental impact of hypolimnial releases from Llyn Brianne
6427Water plants : their function and management
6428Review of Sea Trout Fecundity
6429A review of available information sources for assessing the hazards and risks of chemical substances in the environment. Final report : recommendations for the acquistion of certain sources of environmental data
6430A unified information system to satisfy the NRA's requirement for ecotoxicology information: the specification study
6431Algal Monitoring Report 1999. Report summarising freshwater (cyanobacterial) and marine microalgal monitoring during 1999
6432Algal Monitoring Report 2000. Report summarising freshwater (cyanobacterial) and marine microalgal monitoring during 2000
6433Direct toxicity assessment : a step towards better environmental protection within the UK : business strategy
6434Direct toxicity assessment proficiency scheme (DTAPS) : Document 1 : Issue 5
6435Direct toxicity assessment proficiency scheme (DTAPS) : Document 3 : Issue 10
6436Ecotoxicology : a report of the NRA R and D Ecotoxicology Group
6437Ecotoxicology : new approaches
6438Investigating Links Between Bacterial Exotoxins and Unexplained Fish Kills: Phase 3
6439Hydrodat : groundwater monitoring database system. Guidelines
6440Pesticides 2000 : a summary of monitoring of the aquatic environment in England and Wales
6441Analysis of methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) and other petroleum oxygenates in water
6442Hydrometric asset condition survey action plan 1998 - 2001 : annex 1
6443The results of fish telemetry trails in the river Tawe estuary, 1991
6444Analysis of airborne platform specifications and operations for the National Rivers Authority by Atlantique Reconnaissance Ltd
6445Compact airborne spectrographic imager : CASI
6446Aircraft utilisation study
6447Coastal baseline survey January/February 1995 : results
6448Gulliver
6449National marine baseline survey 1995 : littoral cell 10 : Bardsey Sound to Great Orme
6450Validation of statutory sampling sites using aerial surveillance : case study 4